Dr. Mahfoud Amara
President Trump played a role in securing the 2026 FIFA World Cup for the United States, alongside co-hosts Canada and Mexico.
During his presidency, he actively supported the United 2026 bid.
He publicly expressed his backing for the bid, even issuing tweets encouraging international support while warning countries that did not back it.
He recently proposed 10% tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China which could have significant repercussions for the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
These tariffs would likely increase the cost of goods and services essential for the tournament, such as construction materials, technology, and equipment, leading to higher expenses for infrastructure development and event planning.
Additionally, retaliatory tariffs from these countries could disrupt supply chains, further complicating logistics and preparations.
Many essential items for large-scale sporting events, including electronics, sports equipment, and merchandise, are imported from China.
The increased costs due to tariffs could raise expenses for event organizers, affecting the availability and pricing of crucial supplies.
Disruptions in supply chains may lead to delays, impacting venue construction, promotional materials, and overall event execution.
Beyond trade concerns, recent wildfires in California add another layer of complexity. Infrastructure, transportation, and accommodations for the World Cup could be affected, posing challenges for venue readiness and safety.
Event planners may need to allocate additional resources for emergency preparedness and even consider backup venues, further increasing costs and complicating logistics.
For President Trump, tariffs have traditionally been a tool for protecting domestic industries and addressing trade imbalances. They may also serve as a negotiation strategy in trade discussions with China, Canada, Mexico, and potentially the European Union.
While the impact on global sporting events like the World Cup is significant, these effects are likely considered secondary to key driven economic/ business, political and military interests (taken over by the big tech companies).
Soccer has not held the same prominence in the United States as sports like American football, basketball, or baseball.
As a result, the administration’s priorities may not align with the interests of the soccer community.
President Trump has historically enjoyed strong support among fans of major American professional leagues, particularly the NFL, MLB, and NASCAR, which align more with his voter base demographically and culturally.
Yet, the impact of tariffs extends beyond Soccer and the FIFA World Cup, affecting professional leagues and teams, for instance Canadian teams participating in American leagues such as the NBA and MLB. Increased costs for equipment, travel, and logistics could strain budgets, potentially influencing player salaries, ticket prices, and overall financial planning.
Cross-border league operations and international fixtures may also face logistical challenges.
While these economic and policy decisions primarily serve broader trade and political agendas, their indirect consequences on sports—both at the global and domestic levels—should not be overlooked.
Dr. Mahfoud Amara is an Associate Professor in Sport Social Sciences and Management at Qatar University.
